|
Slobodan Antonić Filozofski
fakultet Novi
Sad |
Izvorni naučni članak UDK: 329 Primljeno: 31.01.1999. |
Social and Party Cleavages in Montenegro
ABSTRACT In this paper I continue to examine usefulness
of the Lipset’s and Rokkan’s conception of party cleavages, applied to the case
of Montenegro in the 1920s and 1990s this time. Electoral behaviour of the
electorate in the 1920s suggests that two cleavages (out of four main types of
the Lipset-Rokkan’s cleavages) used to dominate. The first cleavage used to be the
one between the authoritarian-etatistic (represented by the Radical Party) and
libertarian-democratic blocs (represented by the Democratic Party). The second
one used to be the one between the pro-autonomy bloc (the Montenegrian
Federalistic Party, e.i. Montenegrian Party, and since 1926 the Communist
Party) and pro-integration bloc (Radicals, Democrats, Republicans, Peasants).
In Montenegro of the 1990s, these two cleavages dominate again. Gradually the
cleavage between the authoritarian-etatistic and libertarian-democratic blocs
has been deepening. At the end of 1990s one finds the political forces of the
first bloc gathered around Milo Đukanović (the Democratic Party of Socialists,
People’s Party, Socialdemocratic Party, etc.), while the forces of the second
bloc are gathered around Momir Bulatović (the Socialist People’s Party). This
cleavage is overcoming, step by step, the other important cleavage – the one
between the pro-autonomy bloc (Liberal Alliance, SDP, etc.) and pro-integration
bloc (the DPS, PP, SPP, etc.). Why do nowadays party cleavages in Montenegro
resemble the ones in the 1920s? Similarly to the case of Serbia, I seek for an
explanation within the thesis that similar social structures produce similar
party and social cleavages whenever they get an institutional opportunity for
doing so. Given the same political context in the 1920s and 1990s (namely the
common state[s] Montenegro has been a part of) and similar power structures
then and today, no wonder that the strategies of political elites are similar,
and therefore the basic political cleavages as well.
KEY
WORDS party cleavages, authoritarianism,
democracy, Montenegro.